Official publication of Rawalpindi Medical University
Visitors Mediated Spatio-Temporal Variation in Noise Pollution of Lahore Zoo and Possible Effects on Animal Behavior
ARticle PDF

How to Cite

1.
Salma H, Hassan Abbasi G, Saleem K, Ahmad N, Nadeem M, Ali M, Irfan M, Ayub MA. Visitors Mediated Spatio-Temporal Variation in Noise Pollution of Lahore Zoo and Possible Effects on Animal Behavior. JHCC [Internet]. 2024 Aug. 20 [cited 2025 Apr. 30];3(1). Available from: https://jhcc.supp.journalrmc.com/index.php/public/article/view/6

Abstract

Lahore Zoo is an ex-situ conservation facility housing various indigenous and exotic species of captive wild animals and is a source of gratification for visitors, especially children. The location of Lahore Zoo is very prominent in this regard, making it a most active and accessible tourist/visitor destination. On average working days, around 3000-4000 visitors are recorded in Lahore Zoo, which can shoot up to 20,000 on peak weekends and public holidays. The present investigation was carried out to measure spatial and temporal variation in sound levels (dB (A)) at selected sites, along with on-site behavioral recording of selected animals throughout the week. Spatial analysis (Inverse Distance Weighted -IDW) of recorded sound data was done with ArcGIS 10.5 software. A comprehensive questionnaire was also designed to determine visitors' attitudes toward this issue. Results for sound level reveal that the average sound level was under the WHO limits mostly during weekdays, where the average visitor number ranges from 3838 to 4148. On weekends, it goes from 8950 to 19154 visitors with loud noise recorded at most sites. Results from the general ethogram revealed that socially interactive species like monkeys, deer, and bears were more responsive towards visitors, unlike felines (leopard, tiger and lion) which increased their resting period with increased visitor density. Highlighted noisy areas by surveyed visitors were Tiger, Lion, Deer, Monkey, Aquarium, Rhino, Wolf, Cafeteria, Bird section, Ostrich, Camel, Snake House, Zebra, Giraffe, and Bear. To combat this issue, an awareness campaign has been done in the zoo to educate visitors.

https://doi.org/10.37939/jhcc.v3i1.6
ARticle PDF

References

Berg, R. E. Sound. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2022 Dec 08. https://www.britannica.com/science/sound-physics

Clark FE, Fitzpatrick M, Hartley A, King AJ, Lee T, Routh A, Walker SL, George K. Relationship between behavior, adrenal activity, and environment in zoo‐housed western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Zoo Biology. 2012 May;31(3):306-21. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20396

Popper AN, Hawkins AD. An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes. Journal of fish biology. 2019 May;94(5):692-713. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13948

World Health Organization. Burden of disease from environmental noise: Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2011.

Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJ, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95. DOI: 10.1038/416389a

Cardoso P, Barton PS, Birkhofer K, Chichorro F, Deacon C, Fartmann T, Fukushima CS, Gaigher R, Habel JC, Hallmann CA, Hill MJ. Scientists' warning to humanity on insect extinctions. Biological conservation. 2020 Feb 1;242:108426.

Erbe C, Thomas JA. Exploring animal behavior through sound: Volume 1: Methods. Springer Nature; 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108426

Kight CR, Swaddle JP. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology letters. 2011 Oct;14(10):1052-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x

Duarte CM, Chapuis L, Collin SP, Costa DP, Devassy RP, Eguiluz VM, Erbe C, Gordon TA, Halpern BS, Harding HR, Havlik MN. The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean. Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):eaba4658. DOI: /10.1126/science.aba4658

de Queiroz MB. How does the zoo soundscape affect the zoo experience for animals and visitors?. University of Salford (United Kingdom); 2018.

Anthony A. Criteria for acoustics in animal housing. Laboratory animal care. 1963 Jun;2:340-50. PMID: 14013315.

National Institute of Health Consensus Report. Consensus conference. Noise and hearing loss. JAMA. 1990 June 20;263(23):3185–3190.

Williams LJ, Finch K, Agnew R, Holmes L. Effects of nearby construction work on the behavior of asiatic lions (Panthera leo persica). Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens. 2021 Feb 27;2(1):66-74. DOI: 10.3390/jzbg2010005

Pifarré M, Valdez R, González-Rebeles C, Vázquez C, Romano M, Galindo F. The effect of zoo visitors on the behaviour and faecal cortisol of the Mexican wolf (Canis lupus baileyi). Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2012 Jan 15;136(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.11.015

Chosy J, Wilson M, Santymire R. Behavioral and physiological responses in felids to exhibit construction. Zoo biology. 2014 Jul;33(4):267-74. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21142

Larsen MJ, Sherwen SL, Rault JL. Number of nearby visitors and noise level affect vigilance in captive koalas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2014 May 1;154:76-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.02.005

Quadros S, Goulart VD, Passos L, Vecci MA, Young RJ. Zoo visitor effect on mammal behaviour: Does noise matter?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2014 Jul 1;156:78-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.04.002

Wark JD. The influence of the sound environment on the welfare of zoo-housed callitrichine monkeys. Case Western Reserve University; 2015.

Suárez P, Recuerda P, Arias-de-Reyna L. Behaviour and welfare: The visitor effect in captive felids. Animal Welfare. 2017 Feb;26(1):25-34. DOI:10.7120/09627286.26.1.025

Dancer AM, Burn CC. Visitor effects on zoo-housed Sulawesi crested macaque (Macaca nigra) behaviour: Can signs with ‘watching eyes’ requesting quietness help?. Applied animal behaviour science. 2019 Feb 1;211:88-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.12.005

Jakob-Hoff R, Kingan M, Fenemore C, Schmid G, Cockrem JF, Crackle A, Van Bemmel E, Connor R, Descovich K. Potential impact of construction noise on selected zoo animals. Animals. 2019 Jul 31;9(8):504. DOI: 10.3390/ani9080504

Pelletier C, Weladji RB, Lazure L, Paré P. Zoo soundscape: Daily variation of low‐to‐high‐frequency sounds. Zoo Biology. 2020 Nov;39(6):374-81. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21560

Harley JJ, Rowden LJ, Clifforde LM, Power A, Stanley CR. Preliminary investigation of the effects of a concert on the behavior of zoo animals. Zoo Biology. 2022 Jul;41(4):308-27. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21676

Waterman JO. Human-macaque encounters in Ifrane National Park, Morocco: behavioural, spatial, and temporal coping strategies of the Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Lincoln).

Hosey GR. Zoo animals and their human audiences: What is the visitor effect?. Animal Welfare. 2000 Nov;9(4):343-57. DOI: 10.1017/S0962728600022946

Birke L. Effects of browse, human visitors and noise on the behaviour of captive orang utans. Animal Welfare. 2002 May;11(2):189-202. DOI: 10.1017/S0962728600028141

Choo Y, Todd PA, Li D. Visitor effects on zoo orangutans in two novel, naturalistic enclosures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2011 Aug 1;133(1-2):78-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.05.007

O'DONOVAN DE, HINDLE JE, McKEOWN SE, O'DONOVAN SE. Effect of visitors on the behaviour of female Cheetahs acinonyx jubutus and cubs. International Zoo Yearbook. 1993 Jan;32(1):238-44.

Owen MA, Hall S, Bryant L, Swaisgood RR. The influence of ambient noise on maternal behavior in a Bornean sun bear (Helarctos malayanus euryspilus). Zoo biology. 2014 Jan;33(1):49-53. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21105

Wells DL, Coleman D, Challis MG. A note on the effect of auditory stimulation on the behaviour and welfare of zoo-housed gorillas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2006 Nov 1;100(3-4):327-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.12.003

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Health and Climate Change